Nonoperative Management of a Perforated Peptic Ulcer in the Setting of Decompensated Alcoholic Cirrhosis

A Case Report

Authors

  • Sam Dunseith University of Toledo
  • Dr. Sarah Hill Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
  • Dr. Kunal Yadav Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46570/utjms-2026-1698

Keywords:

Peptic ulcer disease, Bleeding peptic ulcer, Decompensated cirrhosis, Alcoholic cirrhosis, Nonoperative management

Abstract

Perforation of peptic ulcers is typically considered a surgical emergency, but management must account for patient comorbidities. Surgical management of perforated ulcers in the setting of decompensated cirrhosis can be complicated by coagulopathy and delayed wound healing, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. This case outlines the nonoperative management of a perforated peptic ulcer in a 47-year-old male with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis. Computed tomography scan revealed pneumoperitoneum, and further imaging showed a large perforated ulcer of the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb. Due to the patient’s high preoperative risk, a nonoperative approach was chosen by his multidisciplinary care team. Initial management included nil per os with nasogastric tube decompression, antibiotics, and therapeutic paracentesis. Due to the patient’s declining hemoglobin, an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed, and the hemorrhage was treated with epinephrine injection and clipping, followed by placement of a percutaneous pigtail catheter adjacent to the site of perforation. An upper gastrointestinal series completed 11 days later showed no leak from the site of perforation. The patient tolerated dietary advancement and continued to improve until discharge on hospital day 36. In this case, a nonoperative approach yielded resolution of the patient’s bleeding perforated ulcer and resulted in a favorable outcome for our patient.

References

Crofts, T.J., K.G. Park, R.J. Steele, S.S. Chung, and A.K. Li, A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med, 1989. 320(15): p. 970-3.

Songne, B., F. Jean, O. Foulatier, H. Khalil, and M. Scotte, [Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study]. Ann Chir, 2004. 129(10): p. 578-82.

Donovan, A.J., T.V. Berne, and J.A. Donovan, Perforated duodenal ulcer: an alternative therapeutic plan. Arch Surg, 1998. 133(11): p. 1166-71.

Taylor, H., Perforated peptic ulcer; treated without operation. Lancet, 1946. 2(6422): p. 441-4.

Cao, F., J. Li, A. Li, Y. Fang, Y.J. Wang, and F. Li, Nonoperative management for perforated peptic ulcer: who can benefit? Asian J Surg, 2014. 37(3): p. 148-53.

Bucher, P., W. Oulhaci, P. Morel, F. Ris, and O. Huber, Results of conservative treatment for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Swiss Med Wkly, 2007. 137(23-24): p. 337-40.

Lopez-Delgado, J.C., J. Ballus, F. Esteve, N.L. Betancur-Zambrano, V. Corral-Velez, R. Manez, A.J. Betbese, J.A. Roncal, and C. Javierre, Outcomes of abdominal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol, 2016. 22(9): p. 2657-67.

Tinkoff, G., M. Rhodes, D. Diamond, and J. Lucke, Cirrhosis in the trauma victim. Effect on mortality rates. Ann Surg, 1990. 211(2): p. 172-7.

Doberneck, R.C., W.A. Sterling, Jr., and D.C. Allison, Morbidity and mortality after operation in nonbleeding cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg, 1983. 146(3): p. 306-9.

Lehnert, T. and C. Herfarth, Peptic ulcer surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Ann Surg, 1993. 217(4): p. 338-46.

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

1.
Dunseith S, Hill DS, Yadav DK. Nonoperative Management of a Perforated Peptic Ulcer in the Setting of Decompensated Alcoholic Cirrhosis: A Case Report. Translation [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 28 [cited 2026 Oct. 30];16(2). Available from: https://openjournals.utoledo.edu/index.php/translation/article/view/1698