Improvement of in-office Blood Pressure targets in an Academic primary care setting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-856

Keywords:

internal medicine, quality improvement

Abstract

Background  

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in an office-based setting is essential for diagnosis and management of hypertension. Staff education on proper blood pressure measurement technique and recording is a focus of recent hypertension guidelines. (1) Compared with other methods, unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure (AOBP) devices reduce measurement errors and improve BP Management. (2,3,4) The addition of AOBP to staff education needs to be assessed objectively. 

 

Objectives 

To determine the effect of staff education on proper BP measurement and addition of AOBP devices on BP targets in an academic general internal medicine clinic.   

 

Methods 

Education was provided to the medical staff on how to appropriately check BP in general and on the proper use of the AOBP devices. Education was repeated in several intervals to ensure consistency in practice. Six AOBP Hillrom (Welch Allyn spot 4400) devices were deployed for the clinic. Devices allowed for three automated readings 1 minute apart eliminating the first reading and keeping the other 2 readings.  Staff were instructed to document two blood pressure readings into the electronic medical record. The number of patients who completed two BP measurements documented in the EMR over time.  

 

Results 

Our results showed timely education with refreshers, increased BP measurement protocol and improvement in BP recordings. Adherence to 2 BP checks increased from 40% in Dec-21 to 99% Jun-23. The percentage of patients with improved BP increased from 40% to 76% after staff education and addition of AOBP.   

 

Conclusion 

Timely education of medical staff and the addition of AOBP could increase the accuracy of in-office BP measurement. 

 

Key word: Internal medicine 

Type of submission: Abstract  

References

Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension, 2020. 75(6): pp. 1334-1357. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15026

Pappaccogli M, Di Monaco S, Perlo E, et al. Comparison of Automated Office Blood Pressure With Office and Out-Off-Office Measurement Techniques. Hypertension, 2019. 73(2): pp. 481-490. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.1207

Stergiou G, Kollias A, Parati G, O'Brien E. Office Blood Pressure Measurement: The Weak Cornerstone of Hypertension Diagnosis. Hypertension, 2018. 71(5): pp. 813-815. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.10850

Landgraf J, Wishner SH, Kloner RA. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement. Am J Cardiol. 2010, 106(3): pp. 386-388. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.040

Journal Cover Art for Volume 11, Issue 3

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Khorsand Askari, M., Shabpiray, H., Khuder, S., Mutgi, A., Vellequette, K., Growden, C., Heyman, L., Lennard, D., Aldrich, S., Clemons, M., Gilmore, J., Joyce, B., & Akpunonu, B. (2023). Improvement of in-office Blood Pressure targets in an Academic primary care setting . Translation: The University of Toledo Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-856

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Dr. Lance D. Dworkin Department of Medicine Research Symposium

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mani Khorsand Askari, Hoda Shabpiray, Sadik Khuder, Anand Mutgi, Ken Vellequette, Cheryl Growden, Lisa Heyman, Dawn Lennard, Sarah Aldrich, Marilee Clemons, Jenni Gilmore, Brenda Joyce, Basil Akpunonu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).