Does Patient Self-Awareness Predict Ankle Fractures?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol8-2020-414Keywords:
X-ray, emergency department, ankle, fracture, radiation, healthcare cost, pain scale, ambulation status, self-awarenessAbstract
Introduction: Ankle injuries represent one of the most common sports and extremity related complaints presented in emergency departments (ED) with over five million ankle injuries annually arising in the United States. The 2007 US National Health Statistics Report stated that lower limb and ankle complaints accounted for 4.1% of all reported body sites undergoing injury in the ED. The purpose of this study was to examine how frequently a sample of ED patients’ perception of having a possible ankle fracture was predictively associated with results of their X-ray evaluation results. Methods: After 2017 IRB approval, a sample of consented adult patients receiving care at the authors’ two Ohio and Michigan ED were asked, “Do you think you broke your ankle?” Regardless of each patient’s answer, they received an X-ray to evaluate for an ankle fracture that was interpreted by a radiologist. Results: A total of 69 eligible patients received an ankle X-ray. The total number of ankle fractures confirmed by X-ray was 20 (29.4% of sample) while 48 (70.5%) of ankles that were X-rayed were not fractured. Six (28.5%) out of 21 males and 14 (30.4%) out of 46 females were found to have a confirmed ankle fracture. The sensitivity of the perceived ankle fracture question was at or below 50% in all sample subgroups except for smokers at 67%. Conclusion: These findings support the importance of an ED clinician’s intuition when considering a patient’s own self-assessment during their clinical decision-making processes
References
Wedmore IS, Charette J. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of ankle and foot injuries. Emerg Med Clinics No Amer. 2000;18(12): 85-113.
Daly PJ, Fitzgerald RH, Melton LJ, Ilstrup DM. Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthopaed Scand. 1987;58.5:539-544.
Niska R, Farida B, Jianmin X. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2007 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;26:1-31.
Teh J, Suppiah R, Sharp R, Newton J. Imaging in the assessment and management of overuse injuries in the foot and ankle. Sem Musculoskell Radiol. 2011;15(1):.
Blackham JEJ, Claridge T, Benger JR. Can patients apply the Ottawa ankle rules to themselves? Emerg Med. 2008;J25(11):750-751.
Stiell, IG, McDowell I, Nair RC, Aeta H, Greenberg G, McKnight RD, et. al. Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians’ attitudes and practice. CMAJ. 1992;147(11):1671.
Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, Naylor CD. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ. 1995;311(7005):594-7.
Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):384-90.
Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Kadesjo N, Shi XQ, Wolff J. Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):8.
Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Brit J Radiol 1997;70:437-439.
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little LB, et. al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(24):13761-6.
Bijur PE, Clarke TL, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.” Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(4):390-392.
Kaminski, Thomas W., et al. “National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Conservative Management and Prevention of Ankle Sprains in Athletes.” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 48, no. 4, 2013, pp. 528–545., doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.02.
David, Shannon, et al. “Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for Acute Foot and Ankle Injuries.” Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 1, 2016, pp. 48–51., doi:10.1123/jsr.2014-0253.
Barelds, Ingrid, et al. “Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Decision Rules to Exclude Fractures in Acute Ankle Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 53, no. 3, 2017, pp. 353–368., doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.04.035.
Ramasubbu, Benjamin, et al. “Evaluation of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of the Low Risk Ankle Rule in One of Europe?s Busiest Pediatric Emergency Departments.” Pediatric Emergency Care, vol. 31, no. 10, 2015, pp. 685–687.
Strauss, H. William. “Radiation Dose From Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography.” Jama, vol. 299, no. 8, 2008, p. 962., doi:10.1001/jama.299.8.962
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
