Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning
The Role of Pre-Instructional Conceptions
Keywords:
Conceptual change, Pre-instructional concepts, Science educationAbstract
Conceptual change, defined as learning that requires the revision of prior knowledge and the acquisition of new concepts, is essential for learning in science. Research has often been framed in the context of misconceptions that need to be corrected. Conceptual change is difficult and essential and should be approached intentionally by recognizing that all learners (including students and teachers) bring pre-instructional conceptions to the classroom. A renewed emphasis for conceptual change research on practical classroom implementation of instructional strategies is necessary for science education to improve. This article builds on the theoretical work done by decades of researchers, while focusing on the real classroom research that has been done on intentional conceptual change.
References
Adadan, E. (2013). Using multiple representations to promote grade 11 students’ scientific understanding of the particle theory of matter. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1079–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9299-9
Barthlow, M. J., & Watson, S. B. (2014). The effectiveness of process-oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12076
Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Duit, R., Treagust, D., & Widodo, A. (2013). Teaching science for conceptual change: Theory and practice. In International handbook of research on conceptual change. Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472
Keeley, P. (2016). Science formative assessment, Volume 1: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. (2nd ed.). NSTA Press.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science & Education, 12(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022665519862
McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). A sustained multidimensional conceptual change intervention in grade 9 and 10 science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1725174
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Intentional conceptual change (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606716
STCSE Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education (2009, March 23). https://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical misconceptions. 1: Theoretical background. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. (2014). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners’ ideas. Routledge.
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4
Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 11–30). Routledge.
Zhang, L., Wang, L., & Treagust, D. F. (2021). Discipline-specific cognitive factors that influence grade 9 students’ performance in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 813–841. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00352B
