Equity in Problem-Based Learning: A Guide for Teachers of Mathematics
Abstract
Achieving equitable outcomes in mathematics instruction is a lofty but elusive goal, as evidenced by standardized test results and representation in high-level courses. The role of teacher bias in choice of instructional materials and implementation requires strategic examination and corrective action in order for an individual teacher to begin pursuing equity in the classroom. Problem-based curriculum is a step towards using high-quality instruction to ensure that all students have access to challenging math and the support they need to succeed. A closer look at a teacher’s implementation of such curriculum illuminates the teacher practices needed to promote equity within the framework of a problem-based instructional model.References
Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. B. (2013). The impact of identity in K-8 mathematics learning and teaching: Rethinking equity-based practices. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Boaler, J. (2002) “Learning from Teaching: Exploring the Relationship between Reform Curriculum and Equity.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4): 239-258.
Bol, L., & Berry, R. (2005). Secondary mathematics’ teachers perceptions of the achievement gap. The High School Journal, 88(4), 32-45.
Fiarman, S. E. (2016, November). Unconscious Bias: When Good Intentions Aren't Enough. Educational Leadership, 10-15.
Illustrative Mathematics. (n.d.) What is a Problem-Based Curriculum? Retrieved from https://curriculum.illustrativemathematics.org/MS/teachers/what_is_pbc.html
Jackson, C., & Delaney, A. (2017). Mindsets and practices: Shifting to an equity-centered paradigm. In Access and equity: Promoting high-quality mathematics in grades 6-8.(pp. 143-155). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Jilk, L. M., & Erickson, S. (2017). Shifting students' beliefs about competence by integrating mathematics strengths into tasks and participation norms. In Access and Equity: Promoting high-quality mathematics for Grades 6-8.(pp. 11-26). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29-64.
Nation’s Report Card (NRC). (2017). NAEP Dashboards - Achievement Gaps. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/dashboards/achievement_gaps.aspx
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principle to Action: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Schoenfeld, A. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31 (1), 13-25.
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. (2011) Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Viadero, D. (2019, February 23). Lags in Minority Achievement Defy Traditional Explanations. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2000/03/22/28causes.h19.html
